A Year in Photos

Photography, fiction, and personal essays form my three primary creative outlets. For this blog's first 18 months, I used it primarily for photography. As I've returned to creative writing, I'll use this blog for fiction, too. Sometimes, when reality needs to be discussed more than truth, I write personal essays.

This blog will continue to showcase as many above-average photos as I can muster. Hopefully my written work will be as good or better than the visual. Whichever drew you here -- photographs or fiction, I hope you enjoy both.
Showing posts with label Zeiss Ikon Contina Matic IIa. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zeiss Ikon Contina Matic IIa. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 17, 2012

Contina Accompanies the K-7

A few days ago I shared some graffiti shots from my K-7. I had one of my Zeiss Ikon Contina Matic IIa viewfinders with me, too, and grabbed some shots with it. This was a camera I had taken out the week before but failed to use the entire roll. First, some shots from the previous week at Yerba Buena Gardens.




A backhoe and its shadow. The latter looking like an abstract horse to me.


Someone needs to gentrify this thing.


I could never live or work in the building with this detail on the front door. IT looks like a very abstract face and it creeps me the heck out.


A repeat of an image also captured on the K-7. Here we see why SLRs are better than viewfinders. The SLR did not partially crop the subject due to parallax.

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Count on the Contina

I have this little Zeiss Ikon Contina Matic IIa. Aside from the shutter not closing on the full second, 0.5, and 0.25 settings, it works beautifully. That includes the light meter, which also works and is still spot-on. This is very rare for cameras of this one's age. But I wasn't 100% certain the meter was functional, so I tested it last week. for a number of shots, I took one with my guess for the settings and another with its instructions. These first four photos show those results.


1/60th, f4. My estimate. Graffiti on a gate. This doesn't bother me like most graffit as it looks like someone wanted it there. It's a very well made piece. The next photo represents the camera's settings.


1/60th f8. There are, as the cliche goes, many ways to skin a cat. Of note, though, the same basic photo returned notably different results with the latter being cast in blue to a much greater extent where the first has a distinctive green feel. This results from two factors: the length of time the light hits the film and the aperture. Different apertures record light in different ways, though I don't fully understand why. I suspect it has to do with the way lenses bend light to direct it toward the film plane, and which wavelengths travel in different areas of the lens or in different ways. I have no idea, and it's something I need to figure out.


1/125th, f16. I just liked the perspective of this fire hydrant and the shadow.


1/300th, f8. Contrary to the above example, these shots look almost identical. There was more direct light at this location than above. The graffiti wall faced north. This had direct sunlight, which may be part of the cause. Also, the colors here are more muted.


1/30th, f2.8. This was a camera reading. Not my favorite shot on the roll, but not bad, especially considering it was hand-held.


Full second, f8. Hotel Vitale. Braced against a lamp post to prevent camera shake. I'd like to re-take this shot with a wide-angle lens to capture light trails from the cars driving past.


Four seconds, f8, hand-held braced against a parking meter. This is totally a viewable shot as a thumbnail. Enlarged, it's a bit too blurry and gives me a headache. However, I'd like to try this again in a better location.